If I use ALSA, the output sample rate is equal to the original file : 44.1, 48, 88.2 or 96Khz. If I use PulseAudio, the sample rate is 48khz, whatever the original file is. You can't just say, "here take this pill and it will make you feel better" without detailing how you came to that conclusion.That one indicates the output sample rate. These things count on any science based platform. The science part asks many details, were the levels matched and how did you match them, etc etc. Like any other scientific experiment, you could start by stating your results (A sounds better than B) but you must at least follow up with the conditions of you approach. On the other hand, if you hate the idea of science telling you one speaker or component is more accurate to the source and you just want to purchase what you like the sound of, then yes, this might not be the place to find your answers. That question is much more complex than can be answered in a couple short forum posts. Sound Reproduction: The Acoustics and Psychoacoustics of Loudspeakers and Room If you really want to begin to answer your first question start by reading Floyd Toole's book, OS: dual boot - same Ubuntu 18.04.03 LTS as per my Music-PC Windows 7 ProfessionalĬlick to expand.It's a good place to learn how to find your answers. PulseAudio enabled, PulseAudio Volume Control (pavucontrol) Workstation-PC (low resolution music from the Internet: Radios, YouTube, Spotify. I went thru several different ways over the years, the above-detailed represents to me the best compromise between all the involved factors. UPnP/DLNA: MinimServer as Music Server, DietPi as OS on my two Rendering Points based on the Odroid C2 & the on-board HiFi Shield 2 DAC package, BubbleUPnP (Android phones) as Control Point And as 3rd layer of course the music player layer(s), Cantata for me, but one has here dozen of players available to chose from (Audacious, DeadBeeF, GMusicBrowser. On top of it, I have MPD as engine layer (JACK might be an alternative). PulseAudio disabled, ALSA - as the very first layer, interfaces with the playback hardware's at the Linux kernel level. Music-PC (No office tasks, only Music, configuration as per the attached screenshot) Also, with DeaDBeeF's built in EQ, you can achieve bit-perfect equalized audio (so long as you've set the output to the proper alsa digital audio report might be interesting to you:Ĭurrently, to me the approach is very simple: DeaDBeeF is also the only free player I'm aware of that can play DSD files (not including non-organizing players like MPV). ![]() To summarize, DeaDBeeF is essentially foobar2000 except Linux-native, and Audacious has an ultra nice default setup that is more coherent with themes in QT desktop environments than anything else IMHO. I've done lots of digging, and they've been my endgame choices for awhile now. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |